Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 20/11/2018
Gan Emma Bennett
Gan Emma Bennett
Sylw
“I believe that NG’s consultations were flawed. Questions went unanswered and the literature was uninformative.
Other technology exists, like underground and subsea, which does not have the negative effects of pylons. These alternatives were never offered to people. Despite Anglesey residents asking for other methods to be considered this was never done.
The consultation was ineffective and not carried out in good faith, as NGET had already published their plans before it commenced, and the only statutory consultation did not consider any other options.
NGET and Horizon have not followed the guidance in The Planning Act 2008, and at no point has the genuine cumulative impact been assessed or consulted on.”
Other technology exists, like underground and subsea, which does not have the negative effects of pylons. These alternatives were never offered to people. Despite Anglesey residents asking for other methods to be considered this was never done.
The consultation was ineffective and not carried out in good faith, as NGET had already published their plans before it commenced, and the only statutory consultation did not consider any other options.
NGET and Horizon have not followed the guidance in The Planning Act 2008, and at no point has the genuine cumulative impact been assessed or consulted on.”
