Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 28/11/2018
Gan Chris Kent
Gan Chris Kent
Sylw
“
National Grid are using the presence of one pylon line to justify a second. It is well known that the Secretary of State is discussing the possibility of further reactors at Wylfa in addition to Wylfa Newydd. If there is no change in Government policy, and none are planned, a second row will be used to justify and third and fourth line. This will destroy a very large part of the islands beautiful countryside
Pylons will be damaging to views of unspoilt countryside, particularly views from within, and views of, the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Pylons will be hugely impact the tourism industry through spoilt, and “industrialised”, countryside. Pylons will similarly impact farming due to permanent land loss and restricted practices. Pylons will be detrimental to house value, which National Grid have not considered.
There is a huge amount of scientific research into the health effects of pylons, and there are quite different views, a bit like the research into tobacco 60-70 years ago. There are serious concerns, about the health impacts on people and farm animals. Much more sensible to to avoid pylons and avoid the risks.
Unfair treatment as Anglesey and Wales are self-sufficient in energy. The pylons will serve mainly to export power to the south east of England, against the wishes of Anglesey people and all levels of democratic representation.
Wales is unique in having a Wellbeing of Future Generations Act, and while National Grid are not bound by this law, Isle of Anglesey County Council is, and more pylons may leave the authority open to legal challenge. Pylons are a poor legacy for future generations.
Other technology exists, like underground and subsea, which does not have the negative effects of pylons.
The consultation was ineffective and not carried out in good faith, as National Grid had already published their plans before it commenced, and the only statutory consultation did not consider any other options.
There are numerous examples where NGET have not followed Government policy, as described in EN-1 and EN-5.
NGET and Horizon have not followed the guidance in The Planning Act 2008, and at no point has the genuine cumulative impact been assessed or consulted on.
”
National Grid are using the presence of one pylon line to justify a second. It is well known that the Secretary of State is discussing the possibility of further reactors at Wylfa in addition to Wylfa Newydd. If there is no change in Government policy, and none are planned, a second row will be used to justify and third and fourth line. This will destroy a very large part of the islands beautiful countryside
Pylons will be damaging to views of unspoilt countryside, particularly views from within, and views of, the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Pylons will be hugely impact the tourism industry through spoilt, and “industrialised”, countryside. Pylons will similarly impact farming due to permanent land loss and restricted practices. Pylons will be detrimental to house value, which National Grid have not considered.
There is a huge amount of scientific research into the health effects of pylons, and there are quite different views, a bit like the research into tobacco 60-70 years ago. There are serious concerns, about the health impacts on people and farm animals. Much more sensible to to avoid pylons and avoid the risks.
Unfair treatment as Anglesey and Wales are self-sufficient in energy. The pylons will serve mainly to export power to the south east of England, against the wishes of Anglesey people and all levels of democratic representation.
Wales is unique in having a Wellbeing of Future Generations Act, and while National Grid are not bound by this law, Isle of Anglesey County Council is, and more pylons may leave the authority open to legal challenge. Pylons are a poor legacy for future generations.
Other technology exists, like underground and subsea, which does not have the negative effects of pylons.
The consultation was ineffective and not carried out in good faith, as National Grid had already published their plans before it commenced, and the only statutory consultation did not consider any other options.
There are numerous examples where NGET have not followed Government policy, as described in EN-1 and EN-5.
NGET and Horizon have not followed the guidance in The Planning Act 2008, and at no point has the genuine cumulative impact been assessed or consulted on.
”
