Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 28/11/2018
Gan Janet Little
Gan Janet Little
Sylw
“I strongly object to a second row of pylons being erected across Anglesey and I wish to offer the following reasons:
Firstly I am of the opinion that the consultation was flawed. From the outset, the National Grid stated that their preferred option was over grounding. They were told throughout the consultation by the people and all political representatives that this was not acceptable. They have ignored this clear view and have acted in accordance to their wishes alone.
Undergrounding is the favoured option because that will not have a long term effect on tourism and farming. It will also lessen the chances of EMF having a detrimental effect on health.
There is no doubt at all that a second row will be seen from AONB and many other places in Anglesey. It is truly ironic that the NG is seeking permission to erect dozens of new pylons while they are taken others down because of the reasons stated above. Pylons are not the 21st century answer to a 20th century problem.
There will be a marked effect on property value. No cumulative impact assessment has been undertaken. We are being badly treated by the National Grid and cast aside as unimportant. They have, and do not, listen to our valid views and objections.
I implore you to reject this planning application and compel the National Grid to seek alternative ways to transmit energy from Anglesey.
”
Firstly I am of the opinion that the consultation was flawed. From the outset, the National Grid stated that their preferred option was over grounding. They were told throughout the consultation by the people and all political representatives that this was not acceptable. They have ignored this clear view and have acted in accordance to their wishes alone.
Undergrounding is the favoured option because that will not have a long term effect on tourism and farming. It will also lessen the chances of EMF having a detrimental effect on health.
There is no doubt at all that a second row will be seen from AONB and many other places in Anglesey. It is truly ironic that the NG is seeking permission to erect dozens of new pylons while they are taken others down because of the reasons stated above. Pylons are not the 21st century answer to a 20th century problem.
There will be a marked effect on property value. No cumulative impact assessment has been undertaken. We are being badly treated by the National Grid and cast aside as unimportant. They have, and do not, listen to our valid views and objections.
I implore you to reject this planning application and compel the National Grid to seek alternative ways to transmit energy from Anglesey.
”
