“Pylons will be detrimental to the tourism industry through spoilt, and “industrialised”, countryside. Pylons will be detrimental to farming due to permanent land loss and restricted practices. Pylons will be detrimental to house value, which NGET have not considered. More pylons will be detrimental to Ofgem achieving their principal objective “… to protect the interests of existing and future electricity … consumers”.

Pylons will be detrimental to views of unspoilt countryside, particularly views from within, and views of, the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and substantially and negatively impact tourism on Anglesey

Unfair and undemocratic – Anglesey and Wales are self-sufficient in generating its own energy. The pylons will serve mainly to export power to the south east of England, against the wishes of Anglesey people and all levels of democratic representation.

Other technology exists, like underground and subsea, which does not have the negative effects of pylons, National Grid have never properly considered the negative impacts to the local community

There is a huge amount of scientific research into the health effects of pylons, and there are quite different views, a bit like the research into tobacco in the 1950’s and 60’s. There are serious concerns, and conflicting views, about the health impacts on people and farm animals. Is it not better to be safe than sorry and not use pylons, why have National Grid dismissed this continued feedback from local residents and politicians”