Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 26/11/2018
Gan Mike Hawkes
Gan Mike Hawkes
Sylw
“I object to this application on the following grounds:
1. The data used for background information relating to the viability of sub-sea connections is now out of data and erroneous. New long-distance sub-sea connections are now in place, negating technical arguments presented;
2. I have received no information relating to additional roads and / or service routes required to support the pylons - the documentation provided to local residents is incomplete;
3. The costs associated with decommissioning pylons has not been considered as part of the overall project accounting. This skews the costs massively in favour of pylons when other options have minimal decommissioning costs. This makes the current application inaccurate and biased.
4. RAF Vally has increased activities, now undertaking additional training - in particular for inexperienced pilots. The pylons provide another risk to RAF students. This risk was not assessed during the preparations for this planning application. The application, therefore, has not considered all current risks.”
1. The data used for background information relating to the viability of sub-sea connections is now out of data and erroneous. New long-distance sub-sea connections are now in place, negating technical arguments presented;
2. I have received no information relating to additional roads and / or service routes required to support the pylons - the documentation provided to local residents is incomplete;
3. The costs associated with decommissioning pylons has not been considered as part of the overall project accounting. This skews the costs massively in favour of pylons when other options have minimal decommissioning costs. This makes the current application inaccurate and biased.
4. RAF Vally has increased activities, now undertaking additional training - in particular for inexperienced pilots. The pylons provide another risk to RAF students. This risk was not assessed during the preparations for this planning application. The application, therefore, has not considered all current risks.”
