Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 21/11/2018
Gan Mr Aron E. Bown
Gan Mr Aron E. Bown
Sylw
“We are a farming family and we are against these plans for more pylons
National Grid Electricity Transmission (NGET) are using the presence of one pylon line to justify a second - they should be getting rid of the first line not building a second
Pylons will be bad for farming due to permanent land loss, restricted practices and animal health and behaviour.
There is a huge amount of scientific research into the health effects of pylons, and there are quite different views, a bit like the research into tobacco in the 1950’s and 60’s. There are serious concerns, and conflicting views, about the health impacts on people and farm animals
Pylons will be bad for views of unspoilt countryside, particularly views from within, and views of, the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Best would be to put the connection under the sea, but buried cables are better than pylons
”
National Grid Electricity Transmission (NGET) are using the presence of one pylon line to justify a second - they should be getting rid of the first line not building a second
Pylons will be bad for farming due to permanent land loss, restricted practices and animal health and behaviour.
There is a huge amount of scientific research into the health effects of pylons, and there are quite different views, a bit like the research into tobacco in the 1950’s and 60’s. There are serious concerns, and conflicting views, about the health impacts on people and farm animals
Pylons will be bad for views of unspoilt countryside, particularly views from within, and views of, the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
Best would be to put the connection under the sea, but buried cables are better than pylons
”
