Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 20/11/2018
Gan Victoria Butcher
Gan Victoria Butcher
Sylw
“I object to the construction overground of a second line of pylons across Anglesey because:
1. I believe the health effects on the local population due to the large amounts of electricity passing within close proximity to homes and work places has not been fully researched. Until that has been done the second line of pylons should not be allowed.
2. Electricity and power should be created for the area in which it is made. It is unfair that most of this energy will be exported to the rest of Britain and the people of Anglesey have to put up with the detrimental impact it will have on our lives.
3. Anglesey is a special and truly wonderful island and the mix of its natural environment, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and tourism with its economic benefits and this possible industrialised landscape does not mix. A second pylon line will be hugely detrimental to the ever growing tourism livelihoods of many residents of Anglesey. Our house prices (which only in the last 10/20 years have become level with the rest of the country) will be impacted.
4. I want to leave my home/island in a better place for the next generation. Wales is governed by a wellbeing for Future Generations Act, if the NGET fall foul to this it will be our local Council who will be responsible for paying and clearing up the problem. They already suffer from an every decreasing budget.
Underground or undersea is a far better solution. If a second line goes ahead what will prevent further planning permission for similar projects. I know in other areas of the country where there were no pre-existing pylons, the line was immediately planned to go underground. Just because we are a small, rural population our views should still be taken into consideration.
”
1. I believe the health effects on the local population due to the large amounts of electricity passing within close proximity to homes and work places has not been fully researched. Until that has been done the second line of pylons should not be allowed.
2. Electricity and power should be created for the area in which it is made. It is unfair that most of this energy will be exported to the rest of Britain and the people of Anglesey have to put up with the detrimental impact it will have on our lives.
3. Anglesey is a special and truly wonderful island and the mix of its natural environment, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and tourism with its economic benefits and this possible industrialised landscape does not mix. A second pylon line will be hugely detrimental to the ever growing tourism livelihoods of many residents of Anglesey. Our house prices (which only in the last 10/20 years have become level with the rest of the country) will be impacted.
4. I want to leave my home/island in a better place for the next generation. Wales is governed by a wellbeing for Future Generations Act, if the NGET fall foul to this it will be our local Council who will be responsible for paying and clearing up the problem. They already suffer from an every decreasing budget.
Underground or undersea is a far better solution. If a second line goes ahead what will prevent further planning permission for similar projects. I know in other areas of the country where there were no pre-existing pylons, the line was immediately planned to go underground. Just because we are a small, rural population our views should still be taken into consideration.
”
