Nid safbwyntiau’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio yw’r rhai a fynegir ar y dudalen hon. Yr hyn a ddangosir yma yw cynnwys a gyflwynwyd i’r Arolygiaeth Gynllunio gan y cyhoedd a phartïon eraill â buddiant, sy’n rhoi eu barn ynglŷn â’r cynnig hwn.
Cysylltiad Gogledd Cymru
Derbyniwyd 09/11/2018
Gan Hugh Griffith
Gan Hugh Griffith
Sylw
“1)Scientific evidence confirms the serious hazards/dangers of these electricity cables on health eg childhood leaukaemia.
2)Pylons will be detrimental to the tourism industry.
3)Pylons have been promoted only on the grounds of cost to consumers BUT at what cost to the people of Anglesey ,who will bear the whole cost of this disgraceful project.
4)National Grid's decisions are undemocratic and unfair considering the objections and opposition from the people of Anglesey and ALL elected representatives(MP,AM,County Council and Community Councils)
5)National Grid's consultation process for the first Phase ie Mode of Transmission was not adequate - the decision was presented as a FAIT ACCOMPLI with National Grid being intransigent and dismissive to the point of ridicule.The discussion regarding the Route of transmission was more personal but again one was in no doubt that National Grid made ALL the decissions.
6)Wales has a Wellbeing of Future Generations Act.Although National Grid may not be strictly Legally bound by this,as this project is in WALES ,it should,out of respect and decency, accept and follow the Act - and not ignore it and treat the legitimate objections of the people of Anglesey with disdainful intransigence.
7)Alternative technology exists now.National Grid is imposing 1950's technology in the 2000's.
8)Have National Grid followed the guidance in The Planning Act 2008?I do not think that at any point has the genuine cumulative impact been assessed or consulted on.
9)I would also question whether National Grid have followed Government policy, as described in EN-1 EN-5.
”
2)Pylons will be detrimental to the tourism industry.
3)Pylons have been promoted only on the grounds of cost to consumers BUT at what cost to the people of Anglesey ,who will bear the whole cost of this disgraceful project.
4)National Grid's decisions are undemocratic and unfair considering the objections and opposition from the people of Anglesey and ALL elected representatives(MP,AM,County Council and Community Councils)
5)National Grid's consultation process for the first Phase ie Mode of Transmission was not adequate - the decision was presented as a FAIT ACCOMPLI with National Grid being intransigent and dismissive to the point of ridicule.The discussion regarding the Route of transmission was more personal but again one was in no doubt that National Grid made ALL the decissions.
6)Wales has a Wellbeing of Future Generations Act.Although National Grid may not be strictly Legally bound by this,as this project is in WALES ,it should,out of respect and decency, accept and follow the Act - and not ignore it and treat the legitimate objections of the people of Anglesey with disdainful intransigence.
7)Alternative technology exists now.National Grid is imposing 1950's technology in the 2000's.
8)Have National Grid followed the guidance in The Planning Act 2008?I do not think that at any point has the genuine cumulative impact been assessed or consulted on.
9)I would also question whether National Grid have followed Government policy, as described in EN-1 EN-5.
”
