The list below is a record of advice the Planning Inspectorate has provided in respect of the Planning Act 2008 process.
There is a statutory duty under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008 to record the advice that is given in relation to an application or a potential application and to make this publicly available. Advice we have provided is recorded below together with the name of the person or organisation who asked for the advice and the project it relates to. The privacy of any other personal information will be protected in accordance with our Information Charter which you should view before sending information to the Planning Inspectorate.
Note that after a project page has been created for a particular application, any advice provided that relates to it will also be published under the ‘s51 advice’ tab on the relevant project page.
Advice given between between 1 October 2009 and 14 April 2015 has been archived. View the archived advice.
The London Resort View all advice for this project
Enquiry
Ms Collins wrote on behalf of Bean RA to ask:
1. If the limits of the proposed development consent order included 100ha of Green Belt south of the A2;
2. If notes of meetings of the Ebbsfleet and Bean Junction Engagement Group were available;
3. If the actions from the meeting on 10th November 2015 with the applicant had been taken forward; and
4. If the anticipated date of submission on the PINS website was correct, given media reports of a 2017 submission date.
Advice given
PINS advised:
1. That we do not know whether the area south of the A2 is currently proposed to be included in the application, and this question is best directed to the promotor;
2. That we are not participants in the Ebbsfleet and Bean Junction Engagement Group, and so this question is best directed to the promotor;
3. That we have not seen an outline programme of the high-level meetings held with consultees, and that the meeting held on 31 March 2016 is the only meeting which we have attended since the meeting on 10th November 2015 in connection with the project;
4. That the anticipated submission date on the website will be updated if the promotor provides a revised submission date.
We invited Ms Collins to contact us in connection with any other questions about the Development Consent process; but since the promotor is still forming the detail of their proposal, we advised that it is best to send them any comments or questions about the proposed resort.
