A417 Missing Link

The views expressed in this page do not represent those of the Planning Inspectorate. This page consists of content submitted to the Planning Inspectorate by the public and other interested parties, giving their views of this proposal.

A417 Missing Link

Received 01 September 2021
From Sean Paul Pritchard-Nash

Representation

A417 Missing link. I strongly object to Option 30 for the following reason. As a young person [redacted] I believe that we have to take responsibility for the future of our planet, and this means having the least impact on it that is possible. I have lived most of my life in Cowley and treasure it and would like my children to have the same wonderful experiences I have had of growing up in the country with nature and fresh air. To me it is very clear following the existing route (Option 12) and widening to a dual carriage way with various traffic flowing methods can solve the situation with the least impact on the environment. It is time to stop being driven by money and start thinking about what we can actively do for the future generations of mankind and animals. Sean Pritchard Nash [redacted]